Andy Murray is definitely on the rise. There is no question about that. But, I am surprised on how British Analysts make meals out of his small victories. Murray beats Roddick, and they claim that he is better than Andy Roddick now. Well, guess what? There are many players who can beat Roddick consistently, and those are people who can return his serve. But, what I was more surprised about was when he lost to Nadal at the Australian Open, and analysts claimed that he was now the second best player in the world! Wait a second! He lost, and he is a better player than Nadal? I think Murray is talented and might win Grandslams someday, but I see him as the next Hewitt. People going to have trouble with his game for a while, but then he will be figured out. It’s as simple as that. There is no guaranteed formula in tennis, and if you rely on a style of game and hardwork, instead of Genius like Federer, then people will find a way to break you. It might take time, but it will happen. Roddick, however, is definitely on the down side. He should know by now that his dream of capturing No. 1 position is next to impossible. I guess there is always No. 2 or No. 3 to fight for. Tough Luck!
Andy Murray: OverHyped?
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
